![]() The fact Lucida doesn't look good in Yosemite says more about the interface than the font, I think. It's prettier than Lucida Grande (although it's also colder, less readable and much less timeless. ![]() Its grotesk style is all the rage these days, and it suits the interface well. Yosemite introduced unified sidebars, and Big Sur fixed a few inconsistencies.Įl Capitan introduced their bespoke San Francisco typeface, which is better than Yosemite's Helvetica. Yosemite jettisons wasted space in title bars that provide neither functional nor aesthetic benefit, and starts integrating controls directly in the first row of available space. Sometimes the bottom of the windows would be completely squared off without any rounding, which makes the interface look inconsistent and unfinished. The rounding radius of window corners was very small, and while it didn't need to be larger, it wouldn't have hurt. The Weather and Stock apps, and a few others, that debuted on the first iPhone largely borrowed from the respective Dashboard widgets first introduced in Tiger. Interestingly, the only major aesthetic concept that ever traveled in the other direction, from OS X to iOS, was the design of Dashboard. This was around when iOS debuted with Helvetica exclusively-and thus begins the saga of forcing iOS aesthetic paradigms into macOS, even if they might be nonsensical in a Mac context. Lucida Grande and Myriad was an excellent pairing, but post-2007 they seemed to introduce Helvetica into OS X at random. (Mismatching system typefaces is enough to drive a designer to insanity.)Īpple's affinity for mismatching fonts wasn't great. ![]() The mixing of Lucida Grande in the system-a incredibly warm, ridiculously readable and very humanist typeface that conveys "open-mindedness" in my opinion-with Helvetica in Notification Center and the early 2010s iTunes, iPhoto, iMovie, and GarageBand was pretty careless. The perspective on them is too realistic, with a vanishing point. Those Mavericks icons, the character and detail of which I love and respect so much, have a very ugly rhythm on the Dock because they're so misshapen. Even in Mavericks, where most of the amateurish, gratuitous, or period-appropriate motifs were ironed out (pinstripes, brushed metal, 'lickable' glossy scrollbars and such), there are things that don't scream "very good design," if not "amateur hour." On the other hand, some of those early OS X releases were ghastly in some areas of execution. And we feel so passionately about this that, every so often, a few folks here will go so far as to reskin Mojave, which is quite a step to take. I think that's what appeals to me and all the others who comment "I miss Mavericks" in this sub, because we feel that the the Mac OS of the past had warmth, and today's feels cold and nearly sterile. Something about the pre-Yosemite interface has a soul and humanist friendliness and spunk that the Yosemite and Big Sur redesigns are missing. I started on OS 9 and have fond memories of early OS X. As a graphic design student, I'm conflicted.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |